As generative AI adoption accelerates, hiring processes face significant risk of exploitation.
Our survey, gathering responses from both recruiters and candidates, reveals that recruiters express both confusion and alarm about how generative AI skews hiring results, while candidates openly admit to using it to gain a competitive edge.
Generative AI is a type of artificial intelligence that can emulate human speech and thought patterns while simultaneously being able to access and understand all data on the internet.
This makes generative AI dangerous in contexts where people are being assessed for knowledge, skills, and authenticity which is essentially the crux of the hiring process.
A majority of job applicants admit to using generative AI to cheat on pre-employment assessments leading to inaccurate data points on which to base hiring decisions.
This leads to re-hires and sunk costs down the line and a potential culture clash where candidates who cheated their way in might not be as committed to the team.
See the impact of generative AI on assessment scoresGenerative AI allows candidates to fabricate and inflate their experience to the extent that recruiters find it difficult to make informed hiring decisions again leading to re-hires, sunk costs and .
Generative AI conceals actual experience and skillEarly and mid-career professionals are able to generate a fake portfolio with relative ease. This allows them to showcase a higher level of skillset than they actually have.
True Assess helps you identify and address vulnerabilities in your hiring process. By considering strategies and emerging technologies candidates use to outsmart your process, we ensure your hiring data is accurate and untampered.
Our consultation leads to more effective hiring outcomes and a workforce aligned with your company culture. We enhance the integrity of your assessment processes, ensuring only genuinely qualified candidates join your team, fostering a cohesive and ethical work environment for long-term success.
Review the assessment platform to gauge risk factor from generative AI.
Simulate the candidate experience including interviews to identify exploitable gaps.
Collaborate with the hiring team to understand current hiring processes, decision-making, and data usage.
Provide a detailed report with identified risks and improvement recommendations.
The average job posting in the US receives 80 applicants. It only takes one of these applicants to outsmart the hiring process and cost you thousands.
A bad hire with an annual salary of $72,000 will amount to a sunk cost of $0 if realized and terminated within 3 months.